Wednesday, 16 December 2020

Fulcrum

 In this age of whatever it is unfolding rapidly into whatever it will be, it is perhaps my role to be a centre point, a fulcrum of stability around which all else revolves. Unlikely though. That it would be very fine though is something even the most sceptical of us must surely admit - though perhaps out of some perversity, some need for self-assertion, some wouldn’t admit it. Admitting it or not though there would be the world revolving, in harmony, in tumult and everything in between, and there at the centre me, a calmness preventing as it were chaos. Maybe someone else though would be better suited to the role, someone for whom all that calmness might be more natural and who after a while wouldn’t get bored. Maybe I’d be better out amidst the tumult, engendering it even, and the tension between the likes of me out at the edge and this great calm at the centre would be some great force, in balance and yet always in extension, dynamic and not destructive. And just to say I wouldn’t be one of those snarling idiots out there just destroying things thinking I was doing something wonderful. I’m not quite sure what I’d be doing but I’m sure it’d be more in the lines of construction than destruction. But it’s all the same isn’t it at the end of the day? No, it’s not.

It’s amazing where you end up after pushing out a few words into nothingness and then follow along in their wake so to speak. The boundaries of the real have been stretched.

Tuesday, 15 December 2020

Law

[I wrote this a few years back and just looking at it recently it has it seems to me to have become more apposite, that there is a sifting process going on at the moment, particularly vividly in the States, and so anyway with that in mind I’ve dug it back out from its dusty virtual shelf, even if it is kind of unfinished. To add, when I write something like this it’s not done strategically, which would involve having a firm idea what underlying reality I may be referring to, and what relevant points are then being made. Instead I try to keep such thoughts away and insofar as possible allow the piece to flow on its own terms so it can look after itself without my conscious mind intervening and trying to direct things, which would inevitably result in far narrower and more finite energetic/artistic structures.]

There was a law, and what are laws but to be broken, but this it seems was an absolute law, in full accord with reality, and so could not be broken. It was a law of nature. And so what did man do - man in the collective - but gather himself together and strain himself to the utmost to try and break this law, to test its absoluteness. All means, instruments, tools were used in all kinds of ways but to no avail. The law remained, unbroken - which was very satisfactory. Man put down his tools. Now he had his law. 

But after a while it turned out not all had put away their tools, or if they had, some of them, they'd taken them back up again. Whatever was wrong with them - they must have been possessed of some kind of infection - they could not be stopped. They were met at first with bemusement, but this soon turned to anger, outrage even, and out of all proportion one might have thought to the scale of things, but maybe they feared some kind of response from above, so to speak, some collective form of retribution, for what kind of way was this to behave towards the law? 

And so tolerance of those who refused to put away their their tools became intolerance - requests gentle and stern having been ignored, threats of excommunication and exile likewise, their instruments were confiscated, smashed, leaders imprisoned; but the infection it seemed was a fatal one, and those in its grip went underground and carried on their tests in some kind of darknesses, modern catacombs as it were beneath the city.

What did they hope to gain? Did they really think this law could be broken? And even if they were to find points of weaknesses within it, however impossible and unlikely - what could they expect to do then? They could hardly expect to be able to bring these findings - however dubious - overground, not now. But you can't really ask a man in a fever to logically justify why he is feverish - why he doesn't just discard his fever. And anyway whatever they might do later with their findings could, they might answer, look after itself then. 

And whatever about the law in its core, they were led in their pursuits down all kinds of tributaries, sometimes confined for ages within the most torturous of currents, but which would suddenly and unexpectedly open into grand spaces, illuminating darknesses - darknesses they hadn't even realised were darknesses - and having gazed all around, having peered into all the corners, then a choice of tributaries, directions, would be theirs, where to next, and so their explorations were rewarded more and more, and on and on they were drawn further and further down into the unknown.

Did they stop and wonder at all where they they might be being led? Were they keeping pace, internally let’s say, with their discoveries? Should they, to try and keep some sense of perspective on things, come up for air a bit more often? Let’s say for example someone found out how to split the atom, one giant step for whoever, but at the same time he has the emotional maturity of a ten year old. What’s he going to do with his atom?

But anyway, whatever about the mental health of these people underground, in time word of their mysterious workings began to seep upwards, this word behaving akin to some gaseous substance, to which however the older generation, in general, seemed immune. These gases could writhe slowly all about them, but it was as if they were encased in some impenetrable shell. But for the younger people though, these vapours from below seemed often to seep through every pore and even take possession.

And so the finest minds, who it seemed were most vulnerable, were ever more being drawn underground, joining the strange mental crusade, the momentum of which was gaining, while above, the city now largely bereft of the finest of the rising generation, became more stagnant and brittle, and whose shrill cries of condemnation of what might be going on underneath appeared all the more desperate.

And then as time passed, numbers began to emerge from below, with papers and proofs, solemn but not far beneath the solemnity, jubilant, fearful and mocking; and what could the city leaders do but welcome them back, obsequiously; and so pale from lack of sun and with hard, fixed eyes, these inhabitants of underground returned and took up their seemingly unquestioned places at the head of society, redirecting its flow. 

The time-piece upturned, underground was now overground, and what, a little further in time happened but some of the most archetypal beings of overground began to go underground. These most emblematic of people were not as you might expect so much the leading establishment figures, who with a little bit of shuffling managed to cosy themselves in with the new order, and go on in truth much as before. 

No, the people most in tune with the previous way of life, those who most believed in it, believed in it with their very blood so to speak, were much less noticeable. They departed quietly, made little fuss, but left, at least in the immediate aftermath of their absence, an uneasy impression - their departure only being noticed after the fact. Why had they left? It was puzzling, but still, whatever it was about, they were obviously no loss. There was more room for the rest of us. 

With their departure underground these exiles found something they didn't expect to find, which was that these realms weren't quite as empty as they'd expected. Evidently not everyone had gone back above ground, and those they found who had remained were it seemed the purest forms of the earlier waves downwards. Those who were heading back up to take possession looked on these few as mad; and when these mad few had in response to the mockery of the more worldly majority simply ignored them, this had only raise their contempt all the more. They were going up to usher in a new age, and meanwhile these mad fools didn't even bother to glance over their shoulders at their departure, they mattered so little to them. That these madmen were the most gifted of the experimenters was a bit inconvenient, but somehow or other could be explained by their very madness. In their very addiction to truth they had lost sight of it - or something like that.

And with the arrival of the newest wave from above, the denounced retrogrades, interestingly, the two unworldly groups seemed to recognise each other - inwardly. They had found themselves together underground by some kind of sifting process, some sieve, as could perhaps also be said of those overground. Sheep and goats as it were.

And so how did the two hemispheres progress? Naturally, upstairs – so to speak – the old Law was overthrown, but not with any great fuss. It was discarded, thrown in the rubbish, amidst, insofar as it was noticed, laughter. Word of its departure went largely unmentioned but for the odd mocking reference; its presence had been imaginary in the first place so what was there to miss. New laws had been put in place but funnily these laws and their nature tended to go unmentioned also. It was more a case of inferring their existence than anything else, though there were very few it seemed to do much inferring. Whatever these new laws were though, they were essential. One could be sure of that.


Commitment

I have committed myself to writing every day something or other. The why behind this commitment I’m not too sure about, and to be honest I’m a bit dubious about the strength of the commitment also.  I can’t even actually remember making any commitment. Maybe it just arose in the act here of writing about it and I’m just going along with it for the sake of ... emm ... art.

But what if even if I fulfil the commitment and do write away every day something or other but what gets written isn’t worth writing? Any fool can string some words together, but that doesn’t mean they’re worth stringing. Even that just there ... worth stringing ... it’s awful. But at least you might say I know it’s awful. And I could of course go back an erase it, replace it with something a little more elegant, but I think I’ll leave it there instead for the sake of integrity. What kind of integrity would that be? Who knows. Maybe it’s really just laziness.

Anyway am I really supposed to place those kind of words there - stringing and so on - as if on top of a hill, like a standard, and stand back proudly? Look at me there. I even look like I’m expecting something. Praise no doubt, and maybe even something tangible to go with the praise. I wonder is it the writing or the commitment I’m so pleased about. Probably both. 

So this will do for now. I have fulfilled my word. I wouldn’t exactly be full of expectations regarding future actions regarding all this but I can hardly be held accountable for that. I only inhabit the present after all. Pledges about future virtues are always a bit dubious.


Friday, 11 December 2020

In General

 “What do you think of tyrannical fuckwits?” 

“What do you mean - in general or individually?”

“More in general I suppose.”

“Well I wouldn’t think much of them in general but then again you have to treat people individually.”

Thursday, 10 December 2020

Intervals

 It is my duty to write but for that I must await inspiration, otherwise I could come out with any old rubbish, set it down and leave, fully satisfied with myself: ‘There, I have written. Let them read and be filled with my words” - not caring what kind of words they are, it’s enough that it’s just me at the other end of them. So anyway while I wait there is an imbalance, between you and me I mean. I could be sat here for days between sentences, waiting to come up with something, whilst you come along then and read it all in one flow and reap the harvest. Maybe I should get out a stopwatch, if I had one, and time the gaps so the reader could be made more aware of these intervals where on the surface perhaps nothing was happening, just me sat there doing nothing, but internally all this waiting and alertness or whatever was going on, and so if desired the reader can partake of those gaps in some measure to offset the imbalance. So for example you are made aware there was a pause of 17 minutes whilst I was waiting to come up with a next line, maybe it was quite an elusive subject, and so in communion with my act of creation you now also sit there for 17 minutes, or if that’s a bit excessive or inconvenient maybe a set percentage of the relevant time, and then you move onto the next line.

This sounds on the surface all very wonderful and idealistic but now that I’ve had one of those pauses I’ve been going on about I’m not sure how plausible it is really. For one thing I’d have to keep editing my piece after the in the moment fact of its production, and then sticking in new sentences between the original ones informing the reader of time gaps for him or her to follow. Even if the reader was ideologically and emotionally on my side, willing to play his/her/its part, it would surely be disastrous for the flow of composition, the creation itself. I’d never get anywhere. I’d probably be more lost in the world of time gaps than inspiration. That’s the thing about these utopian visions - you can get yourself tied up in all kinds of knots with them.

Wednesday, 9 December 2020

White Supremacist


 A funny little clip using a charming bizarre moment from a white man snarling at a black man that if he doesn’t vote for him he’s not black. “Yes master. Just as you say boss.”

The same white guy previously described Barack Obama as “the first mainstream African American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice looking guy- I mean that’s a storybook, man.” 
Sometimes there’s nowhere left for satire to go.

Tuesday, 8 December 2020

Longer

 Originally this was a much longer piece. I’ve edited it down. I’m not saying it was necessarily better but it was indeed as I intimated or even said outright much longer.

Where’s the proof, you might demand, of how long it was? I applaud your attitude and it pains me to say it but I must admit there is no proof. You’ll just have to take my word for it.

Monday, 7 December 2020

BBC Bias by Design, Dostoevsky and so on


Excellent short piece by former BBC journalist Robert Aiken, author of Can We Trust the BBC, and The Noble Liar: How and Why the BBC Distorts the News to Promote a Liberal Agenda.

And from the same site

I have probably very much overly avoided the world of current affairs over the past good few years, more or less as it seemed to be an arena devoid of any reason for optimism, with both sides of whatever supposed spectrum, regardless of the supposed disparities, ultimately propelled and ‘owned’ by the same very powerful elements. There have been some extremely surprising developments however, one would imagine surely outside of the scripted agenda, such as Britain seemingly leaving the EU, and from outside of the normal political establishment in the US Donald Trump becoming President, vowing to “drain the swamp” and so we’ve had the astonishing situation of the US President actually calling out the mainstream corporate media as ‘fake’ and utterly corrupt - which of course they are. This is almost unimaginable given how condensed and impenetrable the political power structures had seemingly become to infiltration from outside. Such above developments of course have been relentlessly assaulted by the mainstream Western media outlets as catastrophic scenarios, even if for the sake of appearances more right-wing outlets have I presume had to seem positive about Trump.

However the point I had hoped to make, and why I included the second video above about the rolling over of the UK establishment to ‘woke’ ultra-liberal’ elements, is how all this brings to mind Russia of the 1860s onwards, particularly through the fulcrum of the great writer Dostoevsky. What had begun as a laudable movement towards liberty and idealism was instead leading as the years passed towards attitudes amongst the ever more radicalised elements of total nihilism towards existing societal structures, culture and beliefs, especially religious beliefs. The original liberals, educated, refined and with reverence towards higher ideals, looked with growing horror at how the next generations were far more driven by attitudes of nihilistic destruction than for reverence for such effeminate luxuries as art, and of course the highest ideals of the spiritual were beneath contempt. This especially shown in Dostoevsky’s novel Demons which focused very much on the revolutionary movement, its underlying core and where it would most likely lead, namely tyrannical and absolute totalitarianism. Within it and elsewhere the use of the media as a propagandist tool of subversion and intimidation is also touched on, then of course very much in the printed form. That last point about the increasing extremism within the ‘liberal’ leftist movement came to mind recently in a video I saw recently with a former Antifa member.

In ‘The Idiot ‘Dostoevsky in one section focused in on how these elements expected complete liberty of expression for themselves, particularly when accusing others of whatever reactionary vices, but then on the other hand a complete closing down of freedom of expression to elements contrary to themselves. Since by their own definition they themselves were virtuous and anyone at odds to themselves were of course without virtue, then this oppression of these others’ rights to free speech was of course a self-justified process towards the realisation of their already perfectly understood just society, run by themselves. All this is especially relevant to the second video above and its discussion of immense totalitarian powers of prosecution regarding Hate Speech being enshrined within the UK justice system, if in conflict with the ‘woke’ view of things. 


A quick mention also is within Crime and Punishment in the mid 1860s Dostoevsky focused and satirised that movement’s intentional subversion of sexual dynamics and especially the ideal of the family structure in favour of a very liberalised unattached sexuality, where for example an ardent but naive believer in the new ideology proclaims unfaithfulness by one’s wife should even be applauded by the husband as an expression of her liberated spirit and exaltation over moral and institutional bigotry!

This has gone on much longer than intended, and I’m certainly not for now at least going to read it back so apologies for any hypothetical readers out there for both grammatical errors and overall shapelessness.

Saturday, 5 December 2020

Thursday, 3 December 2020

Sunday, 29 November 2020

Nature

“What do you think of this? ‘Nature, fed up with being itself, tied to the Laws of Nature, ushered in man as a contradiction.’”
“It’s very good.”

Dark

The days were getting shorter and shorter, light lessening, pulled towards non-existence. Would this all end in an end to the light? Well no surely because history tells us, or rather memory, for what is history but memory, even if it’s just fabricated ... but anyway memory, history, of course informs us this darkness will not triumph, instead there’s a halt, a pause, a standoff and then a reversal, light cautiously begins to crawl forwards, eats and keeps on eating into the worlds of darkness, marching on till… well, you know the rest, the pendulum one way then another, and so backwards and forwards it swings year after year. Balanced, monotonous, reassuring.


So that’s the pattern. But patterns however reassuring can be broken, and from the debris maybe a new pattern emerging - and so why not here with our ominously advancing darkness? So with this wintry progress of night into diminishing day, let’s say it could be that there is a thread, and hanging from the thread a dark and heavy mass, and this mass is pulling downwards towards a greater darkness, a parent sea of it, and so every year they get to almost within touching distance of each other, and if they meet an infinity of blackness ensues ... But then just before Christmas the thread from which the weight hangs is stretched to the full, reaches no further, the descent stops and then the retreat.

But what if in time, the thread suffers wear and tear, becomes worn and finally snaps, and into the greater darkness plummets the lesser one, and out entirely goes the light. Maybe after the shock of all this has settled you could try lowering into the darkness other threads with hooks attached at the end, and feeling around with these hooks, to pull the fallen weight from the black void, and, the snapped thread replaced, set the pendulum in motion once again, the old flow thankfully resumed. This strange episode lingers a while as a memory, then as a fading myth before finally presumably dissolving altogether. But instead unfortunately no, all that happens with you and your hooks is you pull from the sea treacly drops of night which slide down, off and away, even as they’re being raised up from below. 

Hooks failing, into the darkness are lowered fishing-nets to trawl the depths. But however big the nets, what kind of depths are these, and whatever kind they are the nets again yield nothing but a load of black drops again falling mockingly away as the nets are pulled up. Threads and hooks are lowered again, and hanging from the hooks now volunteers, heroic, equipped with torches carefully lowered into the blackness, but their little lights are swallowed up in the first few feet, illuminate nothing, and back up they return with nothing. We should I suppose be glad at least of their returning.

*

But this is all nonsense, the thread won’t snap...or forget about snapping, what bloody thread?! This is all just some stupid myth, and what’s worse a made up one - though of course they’re all made up, but this one worse again because it’s made up on purpose, and by someone living in of all times the present. What ingratitude.

Thursday, 26 November 2020

Pushing

Presumably the manufacturers of cars are not satisfied with the construction of their vehicles with regard to safety features by being excessively concerned with how they respond to low speed impacts. Instead things of course have to be pushed to more extremes of speed and impact to test the veracity of the construction. Similarly with ideas such as with my last post http://wwwinabstentia-andrewk.blogspot.com/2020/11/sure.html. Someone might claim it is crude or manipulative to push things to such extremes as it discolours the whole unfairly, but it is by such pushing into deeper waters that the veracity is tested and revealed.

Wednesday, 25 November 2020

Sure?

 “We want absolute liberty, and in the absence of God we have it. There is no sin! There are no boundaries to our freedom!”

“What about child abuse?”

“What about it?”

“Is that a sin?”

“No, there is no sin!”

“You’re sure about this?”

“We should even ‘sin’ on purpose as an expression of sin’s non-existence. That would be in truth our highest statement.”

“Lovely.”

Monday, 23 November 2020

Inspirational


 

Does it matter which words are placed in which order? Ever get the feeling you’ve been living in a cartoon?

Monday, 16 November 2020

Movements


 

New Obama Book (Updated)

[I slightly altered the following piece written a little while previously in honour of a true hero of all of ours, and so here I humbly place it before whoever’s eyes and minds it may encounter.]


Barack Obama has a new book coming out called The Bootcamp Years. Oh no sorry, a quick look reveals its actual title is A Promised Land. The mix-up was both understandable and excusable. Other titles of his I see include, upon this quick fact check, Dreams From My Father, The Audacity of Hope and of course Of Thee I Sing - A Letter to My Daughters. There is also Be Vigilant But Not Afraid.

What an arsehole. “No, no! It’s so beautiful!” Yes, yes, the fault I see is mine. It’s just so unusual, so unexpected to meet with such unashamed, unironical and remorseless integrity of spirit, this vision of virtue in human motion - and so, all in all, I lacked the purity within to accept such purity without. You may criticise me but you may not judge me. Anyway, arising from my shame and contrition, I will try to work some of his inspiration into future conversations. It’s the least I can do.

“Blah, blah, blah, blah...”(in lieu of imaginary words)
“Yes, we must be vigilant but not afraid.”
“Oh my God, you’re so right! You have infused within me the audacity of hope.”
“Yes, and with this audacity we may some blessed day reach the promised land.”
“Yes, yes! And in this future bliss, with dreams of our fathers playing in our minds, we will write letters to our daughters of how all this came to pass.”

Unfortunately, as you will have noticed, even when under the exalting influence of Obama’s own words and many hours of meditation,  I was still unable to rise my spirit to the sufficient pitch to be able to plausibly work in the ‘Of thee I sing’ bit. 


Sunday, 15 November 2020

George Soros

 


Just a brief look at the charming George Soros.

Saturday, 14 November 2020

Assholes

I hate to labour a point but anyway...


“There was this planet run by or hijacked by these total assholes.”

“But at least there was the media to keep an eye on them.”

“Yes but the media was owned by the assholes.”

“Oh right.”

Thursday, 12 November 2020

Nicolas de Stael


 A couple of short videos of works by the wonderful 20th century artist.

Discrepancy

 “What do you call the discrepancy between reality and unreality?”

“The media.”

Monday, 9 November 2020

A Hero Emerges


 

“In full view of everyone, how much more warped could you expect someone to be?”
“Emm, probably not much more warped.”

Wednesday, 21 October 2020

Gottingen

I have had many heated discussions in coffee houses about the University of Gottingen. Where in the hierarchy of organised and codified thought is its standing?

To be honest our discussions never really got anywhere.

Tuesday, 13 October 2020

Dostoevsky and Berdyaev

 

This just part one, the rest of the piece can be followed up on if interested. As it nears the end it has a focus on materialism and Judaism that I’m not sure how comfortable I am with, but still overall very interesting. And to add, Berdyaev has a very good book called ‘Dostoevsky: An Interpretation’ for anyone so interested.

Wednesday, 7 October 2020

Temptation and Energy

 Just to very loosely sketch some thoughts on the nature of temptation involving to some degree anyway as a basis traditional religious framework. That temptation has its source in the entity of the fallen angel or devil. The purpose of the temptation from his point of view is that in succumbing to the temptation, we subsequently at least temporarily become lesser beings energetically. In terms of self-awareness this manifesting as shame. And tying in the scientific notion of the conservation of energy, the human who has fallen is as said depleted in his existential state as a spiritual/psychic energetic being, but also this energy has not simply disappeared but has gone somewhere, and that somewhere is to the energy field of the tempter.

However it’s not all bad news or one way traffic as the very act of tempting is itself an energetic act, the tempter is casting some of his energy field, like a fisherman with a bait, in the direction of the relevant person. The energy we’ll say is to be considered simply as energy rather than morally. So if the person feels the temptation - towards whatever makes of one a lesser being, on whatever scale of toxicity! - but steels himself and does not yield to it, then the temptation has actually resulted in the person absorbing that energy as a fuel, and the tempter is the lesser being energetically as a consequence.

Monday, 24 August 2020

Where

“Does the universe exist?”

“Yes of course.”

 “Where does it exist?“

“What do you mean?”

“Well if something physical exists, it must exist somewhere. So where does the universe exist?”

Saturday, 22 August 2020

Album

 “So anyway have you any idea of what to call your new album?”

“Failure is not an option.”

“Right. So any ideas?”

“Failure is not an option!”

“I know yeah, obviously we’ll come up with something. But as of now have you any specific ideas about what to call it?”

“Failure is not an option!”

“Oh right, I think I see what you mean. You mean “Failure is not an Option” is what you want to call the album?”

“Yeah!”

“Right. Yeah yeah, it’s good. ”

Friday, 21 August 2020

Philanthropist

 “Who was Jimmy Savile?”

“He was very famous. He was a paedophile and a philanthropist.”

“There’s some great philanthropists around, isn’t there?”

“There is yeah.”

Monday, 17 August 2020

Take Away

 “Take away the clothes and what have you got?”

“The body.”

“And take away the body and what have you got?”

“No one to ask the question.”


Saturday, 15 August 2020

Unanimous

 A United Nations resolution has been seemingly passed unanimously whereby protagonists in all future armed conflicts, including present ones, will have to wear face masks to help prevent the spread of coronavirus. This, stressed a spokesman, should not have a detrimental effect on the arms industry, whose health is of course vital to all of our well-being, economic and otherwise.

Thursday, 13 August 2020

Palindrome

“Wouldn’t it be amazing if when you read this it was the same forwards as backwards? A palindrome.”
“It might be mildly interesting I suppose.”
“So are you going to do it?”
“No.”


Wednesday, 12 August 2020

Intellect

 “What would you define the intellect?”

“Something which puts a roof over our heads.”

Sunday, 9 August 2020

In

 Does space exist in silence or silence exist in space?

Thursday, 6 August 2020

How to Solve

“How oh master,  are we solve the problems of this earthly realm?”
“Bigger earnings to sports stars. This will balance the scales of karma.”

Saturday, 1 August 2020

The Good

If you have nothing good to say don’t say anything at all. Artistically I mean, artistically good. If it’s not good don’t waste our time with it, in the public sphere at least. In the privacy of your own home of course you can do what you want - as long as it stays there. If there’s one thing this world is against, it’s mediocrity. It is a world obsessed with the Ideal, seeking perfection in all the spheres, particularly the artistic. It exalts genius above all else. None may dare come into the public arena unless possessed of it.