It is usually imagined a question like "Who am I" is a philosophical enquiry. In truth, it is a more a matter of linguistics: what is the agreed nature of this concept "I"?
It seems a simple truth that the idea of the fullness of the mind which produces thought being capable of being meaningfully encompassed within a form of this thought- "I am..." is a simple absurdity, comparable to the idea of the entire ocean being capable of containment within a bucket floating on that ocean.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I agree.
No wait...
Agreement is an emotion that a portion of me feels bound to express on receipt of the comment above.
Hang on.. How about:
So far as it can be said that..
Oh, forget it
Perhaps
Post a Comment