I’m unsure whether to consider this finished or not. Maybe I could improve it, maybe I could wreck it.
I’m unsure whether to consider this finished or not. Maybe I could improve it, maybe I could wreck it.
The soul is quick to change company if we strive to show little diligence.
Isaac the Syrian.
A conversation between two of the globe’s finest citizens:
Computer whizz-kid Gill Bates is set to make an attempt on the musical entertainment business with the release of his new song: It Wasn’t Until You Rejected My Advances that I Realised How Much I Love You. “Gill believes that if he can become an icon in the cutthroat world of philanthropic global healthcare, making it in the music business should be a piece of piss,” revealed a colleague of Bates.
Intriguingly, Irish musical and philanthropic icons Gob Blendorff and Bono (not his real name) are said to have assisted in the composition of the song through clever use of the Skype platform. “It’s amazing - you can be three different people in three different places, but through the use of Skype, if you’re the right people, the barriers come right down, and you can be right there for each other spiritually, creatively and economically,” opined the aforementioned colleague of Bates from up above in the last paragraph. “These are very special people, but they’re also completely normal people,” he added.
I’ll try to make this quick. Regarding the doctrine of utilitarianism, people like Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill tried to scrape some intellectual edifice together that, in the perceived absence of God, would include goodness in their sense of reality, rather than to simply end up with egotism and the satisfaction that of its desires as the highest virtue - which could of course become very unpleasant. The baby of goodness shouldn’t be thrown out along with the bathwater of God. So Bentham ended up trying to argue happiness was the highest good, and acts that promote happiness are good, acts that promote unhappiness are bad, and on the grander scale of things, the acts should aspire to achieve the greatest happiness of the greatest number.
There was even devised something called a Hedonic Calculus, which would help calculate the overall pleasure and pain generated by an action, considering factors like intensity, duration, certainty, and extent. Where could one go wrong? Rationalism was pointing the way.
So anyway, to take one look at what this greatest happiness of the greatest number can quickly justify:
Gang rape.
Yes, there is a victim, but there’s only one. Think of the weighing scales - it’s the happiness of the greatest number that we should be concerning ourselves with. Still, it makes one uneasy. Perhaps the Hedonic Calculus can come to our rescue.
So perhaps one tries to tweak the formula, but after a while of all this awkwardness, the rationalists start to realise they’re better off without this awkward goodness. Everything becomes so messy. Is it really even an element reason needs to concern itself with. Let the ego satisfy itself however it wants, and if that at times leads to the unhappiness of the greatest number, well, them’s the breaks.
For what it’s worth, the X22 Report podcast - if that’s the correct term - after the Venezuela Maduro goings on. Click forward 2 minutes past the initial ads.
A couple of photographic titbits from the episode are pretty interesting:
Not that I remotely keep abreast of these things, from what I could see, this declared dictator and thug, towards whose arrest the Biden regime offered said reward of 25 million dollars, managed to keep going perfectly fine despite Biden’s standing actions - which I suppose isn’t all that surprising seeing as standing isn’t really the most active of verbs.
One interesting point in the X22 show is that the “war against drugs” under the first George Bush wasn’t a CIA war against drug cartels, but a war against competing drugs cartels! The criminal syndicate wanted no opposition! If you were with them and their interests, fine, if against them or in conflict with said interests, not fine.