I think most people probably have very little idea of how extreme and strange hardcore leftist ideology is, lulled perhaps into imagining, insofar as the process is noticed at all, that the ideology’s insertion into the mainstream contemporary West legitimizes it, implies that it conforms to some way reasonable and good limits. I suppose the subconscious sense is that if a wild beast has got into your house, that must imply it is not wild at all, but domesticated. Reality acts as a soporific, however crass and bizarre its manifestations.
So below, from Sergei Nechaev, influential 19th century Russian revolutionary, murderer and author of Cathecism of a Revolutionary:
“We are guided by hatred for everything not of the people, having no moral obligation or honor with regard to the world that we hate and from which we expect nothing but evil.”
He called on the ‘merciless destruction’ of the existing order, and the only morality was what furthered this cause of reducing society to chaos. Nechaev’s program of actions included intentionally betraying his own seemingly like-minded colleagues to the authorities, so that their ensuing imprisonment would further radicalize them, while murdering one now dissenting student, Ivan Ivanov, with the main intent apparently being to, through this act, psychically deepen the bonds of the rest of the revolutionary group together. This was a key inspiration for the character Pyotr Verkhovensky in the 1872 novel Demons by Dostoevsky, in which Verkhovensky exhorts his co-conspirators:
“Your whole step is towards getting everything destroyed: both the state and its morality. We alone will remain, having destined ourselves beforehand to assume power: we shall rally the smart ones to ourselves, and ride on the backs of the fools. This generation must be re-educated to make it worthy of freedom.”
‘Pronouns’, transgender Last Supper mockeries at the Olympics, and on on are exactly such societal destruction/re-education processes that the ideology calls on. So the principal job for the revolutionaries is destructive, not constructive. The entire social-political order is to be destroyed, it being All Bad and in total opposition to All Good of future utopia promised by the totalitarian cult. The existing state is the enemy with which it is at war.
So everything is good that erodes or damages the existent society, and again this is where people might have trouble seeing the dark logic of the progressive cause at work. Within the ideology every act or thought which damages the existent order is good, and thus one ends up then with every criminal act legitimised, through the ideological lens, ‘an act of protest.’ This following isn’t an unfair caricature, a libel on the ideology, but is the cult in its destructive aspects in full flow.
Rape gangs erode the fabric of society. Therefore rape gangs are good.
It really is this extreme and deranged, And this is where one can pretty clearly glimpse or get an idea of the kind of dark spiritual energy that its adherents have opened themselves up to. And to add, in terms of extending the revolutionary logic at play, sanity is itself the target for destruction before the inner ‘utopia’ will rise from its ashes.
And so right now in the US for instance, basically activist judges are seeking to prevent the ridding of the country of illegally present members of very dangerous gangs such as MS13. Apart from the practicalities of being able to contract such people to carry out at a safe distance certain acts, this is simply the ideology at work. The criminal is by definition more true and good than the solid, law-abiding citizen, since the criminal by his acts undermines the social-order, whose existence is opposed to the progress cult.
Of course, the defence of criminals by the ideologues will make a pretence to goodness and legitimacy, but the truth is regarding the actual ideology crime is good since it undermines the order sought to be destroyed. Whether this is all implemeted consciously or more subconsciously doesn’t matter too much - and anyone in sync with the cult is in large part no longer really an autonomous person anyway. The mind has become the host for the computer program, as it were, which is acting in the person’s place.
These kind of manifestations are of course happening everywhere in the West, but just to give one recent and for me local example, RTE, the Irish national broadcaster, reports on a Guyanese man who viciously raped an 18 year old, two days after being allowed into the country as a migrant, despite the fact that he had just been expelled from the UK due to his offences as a convicted rapist. But the Irish authorities, supposedly serving the interests of their citizens, allowed this known rapist in, though they had no obligation whatsoever towards him. What is more odd here actually is the state media outlet actually reported on this case at all, since of course it itself is very much a re-educating servant of the cause:
No comments:
Post a Comment