“Anything alternative to the censorship model they’ll talk of as right wing.” Because as I think I quoted Engels a few posts ago, anyone who opposes the cult of Progress, and its materialistic heaven on earth via communism/wokeism or Brave New Worldism, is by definition an enemy of the good and simply deserves to be annihilated. So you label anyone who doesn’t bow down as right wing, i.e. an enemy of the god of Progress, and from there therefore this enemy of truth and goodness is necessarily and justifiably “cancelled” - this cancelling, depending on the achieved totalitarian status of the state in relation to the individual - ranging from the individual being silenced to being executed or worked to death in the slave labour camps.
And in this short clip, Joe Rogan and Russell Brand are laughing at the disingenuous idiocy of someone like Brand being labelled and dismissed as right wing. But the thing to remember, as happened with endless Bolsheviks under Stalin, is that under the god of Progress, the goalposts are by definition always being moved as if Progress doesn’t keep progressing, how can it be Progress?! And therefore it’s the easiest thing in the world to accuse anyone of being a traitor to the cause, however devoted they may have been to the cause at an earlier stage of its development, since that cause is never static but always progressing! “You were a committed feminist, lesbian leftist, and ten minutes ago this was great. Perhaps you were a lawyer who valiantly prosecuted abusive husbands who physically battered their wives in their own homes. This was wonderful. But wait a minute, now you don’t think a man can call himself a woman and be paid to beat a woman senseless in a boxing ring - maybe even one of these wife battering husbands? Traitor! Gulag!” Sadly she failed to continue to progress, and so turned out to be a right wing traitor to the cause.
So the true disciples to the ideology of Progress have by definition no psychological, cultural or spiritual integrity, since integrity implies and involves being static or steadfast in one’s relation to a fixed point, such as one’s family, that one will not compromise and progress away from it. Again, if Progress isn’t always progressing, it is a traitor to itself! And so here the ideal for the loyal follower is to lack any such integrity and instead to be “fluid”, i.e. to have no inner core and thus no resistance to constantly shifting one’s ground in sync with the progressing times.
No comments:
Post a Comment