Just to follow on from the short piece on Seurat, where I said I preferred his drawings as there was a greater spirit of reality to them - and there is a very unique depth and mystery of being to some of those works. To help with the point, this above a painting, and though actually given the colours are so muted I could have picked much more obvious examples but I prefer this to most of them so I picked this one! But anyway, it’s obviously brilliant and all very elegantly put together, but that’s much of the problem where Seurat’s psychological desire for order demands such mathematical elegance at the expense of freedom. And though the painting has something of that Seurat sense of physical reality emerging out of/ dissolving back into mysterious nothingness, still ultimately Seurat’s personality has imposed itself to create far more a world of stylised unreality by striking contrast to the sense of naked mystery in the previous two posts of his drawings.
Come to think of it, maybe that’s exactly the unusual dynamic at play with Seurat: his psychological mind desiring a solidity to reality - hence all the mathematical elegance - amidst this sense of mystery and uncertainty which he so uniquely manifested. And for example, in this painting above there is no real sense of living people with inner lives here. Inner lives are again freedom and mystery, whereas carefully placing these pictorial representations of physical objects in a highly ordered space offers the illusion of a victory over all this mind-defying mystery. He needed to commit more to the spirit and find truth there, but instead unconsciously he tried to back off and commit more to the physical - and at the living spirit’s expense.
No comments:
Post a Comment