tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2510721759458783546.post4120235277087554175..comments2023-11-21T18:34:53.728+00:00Comments on In Abstentia Out: Evolution and the Open WindowAndrewhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11708539533684206357noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2510721759458783546.post-46159322805829567082008-02-02T22:30:00.000+00:002008-02-02T22:30:00.000+00:00darwin was a very corrupt man who wrote alot of li...darwin was a very corrupt man who wrote alot of lies, his theories of evolution was based on alot of lies and falsified information, the fuegian tribes of south america were depicted as apes by darwin, despite his own private admission that they certainly weren't apes, he also claimed they spoke no more than a hundred words, but europeans who had been learning their language said they had a more colourful and larger language than any european country. darwin also lied about the height of the fuegians whom he called apes. People who communicated with them said that they were an average of 6 foot tall, which was very tall for those days, they were also very well built, they had long hair and darwin falsified claims that they were neanderthals. darwin lied about many other things also. Europeans brought bacterial diseases to the fuegians which wiped them out, witnesses claim this was deliberate genocide, not accidental.<BR/><BR/>And Einstein was also corrupt and a total fraud, and he even admitted his theory of relativity was given to him by a certain jesuit priest (the Jesuits were/are very highly educated and are working to a certain agenda).<BR/><BR/>Frauds like Darwin and Einsteinn were pushed on society and hailed as genius, and true researchers like Nikolai Telsa's work was surpressed. The Jesuit control of society goes ALOT deeper than most can even suspect, they also control the field of science and have done for a long timeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2510721759458783546.post-67105338624426447222008-01-31T17:39:00.000+00:002008-01-31T17:39:00.000+00:00Aldous Huxley wrote that every great truth was obv...Aldous Huxley wrote that every great truth was obvious, but not every obvious truth was great. To a great extent everything is simple. Thus that the concept of reality cannot be dissociated from the conceptual power inherent in the human mind should be self-evident: the very nature of a concept is a product of the reasoning mind. But reality in the direct experiential sense must be beyond concepts & 'understanding' reality, or we have a dual universe of reality & someone understanding it.<BR/>You could also say that the less the mind is tethered to a concept, the more this direct experience- life as opposed to intellectual simulacrum- may occur, and can't occur otherwise.<BR/><BR/>Reality does not exist separate from consciousness, but it isn't dependent on conceptual understanding. <BR/><BR/>"they are interesting, as I see them suggested, precisely for what they reveal about the evolution of the human mind - “which is intrinsic to and indeed is reality itself” - rather than the universe."<BR/><BR/>I suppose I'd agree, not that I've the scientific mind to derive any nourishment from the theorems, but one theorem may be far more 'true' than another, being because it approaches closer to reality than the less adequate, or wrong, theorem. This is the evolution of thought towards conceptual fusion with reality. So, rather than one or the other, maybe they are interesting because of what they reveal about both the mind's evolution towards the real, or universe, & hte universe itself. <BR/>Though the notion that perhaps the universe is deepening as a reslut of the mind's expanding self is also fascinating!<BR/><BR/>Though(one final though), I don't think accurate scientific approximations of reality are in any real sense necessary to anyone's directly experiencing this relaity for themselves, & maybe works of Rembrandts, Bachs & the like are far more vital avenues to truth than the scientific. But as usual only if one has eyes to see & ears to hear.Andrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11708539533684206357noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2510721759458783546.post-18766438102099463252008-01-30T21:00:00.000+00:002008-01-30T21:00:00.000+00:00Bit too tired to respond in any fashion now, Selen...Bit too tired to respond in any fashion now, Selena, but tomorrow I'll try and respond in some kind.Andrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11708539533684206357noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2510721759458783546.post-77938698141769206332008-01-30T18:43:00.000+00:002008-01-30T18:43:00.000+00:00Excellent stuff. You may enjoy Marilynne Robinson'...Excellent stuff. You may enjoy Marilynne Robinson's essay on Darwinism in 'The Death of Adam'.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2510721759458783546.post-21274996351600488602008-01-30T17:27:00.000+00:002008-01-30T17:27:00.000+00:00...reaching into and endeavouring to understand......<I>...reaching into and endeavouring to understand... an almost terrifying depth of intelligence which is intrinsic to and indeed is reality itself</I><BR/><BR/><BR/>And no one summed up this inherently immeasurable state of affairs better than Albert Einstein himself: <BR/><BR/><I>“One may say that the eternal mystery of the world is its comprehensibility.”</I> <BR/><BR/>This was no mere figure of speech, whether we like it or not, Einstein was formulating a very prophetic conclusion: That the concept of reality cannot be dissociated from the conceptual power inherent in the human mind. An indication of this power is of course the way in which the universe has come to be the object of its own attention (through the mind of man, if you like). Nor does it seem to have escaped Einstein’s attention that its apparent grasp of itself can be asserted only through a mathematical theorem. But while one neither presumes nor precludes the general validity of the theorems the physicist has introduced, they are interesting, as I see them suggested, precisely for what they reveal about the evolution of the human mind - <I>“which is intrinsic to and indeed is reality itself”</I> - rather than the universe. <BR/><BR/>In other words, human consciousness is no longer an observational means external to different bodies in space-time, but a conceptual property of space-time itself!<BR/><BR/>DreamySelena Dreamyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11629908887644614404noreply@blogger.com